Students' and teachers' perspectives about quality of engineering education in Portugal

摘要:

Quality in higher education is a subject of increasing importance. This idea can be supported by looking at different sources, namely, the scientific literature, national and transnational governments' policies, such as those emerging from the Bologna Process. Also, the internationalisation of higher education and, within it, students' and staff mobility among institutions, has brought to the agenda the quality issue, particularly with regard to the teaching and learning process. Several authors argue that the meaning of quality depends on who defines it. This article focuses on a study that looks at how teachers and students in higher education institutions, in Portugal and in the domain of Engineering, see the quality issue. Data was collected through interviews to teachers (six) and students (38) in two different Portuguese institutions. The results indicate that, although teachers and students refer to the same dimensions that influence quality, they have different perspectives about their importance. From the point of view of the authors, this discrepancy requires some pedagogical actions in the context where the study was developed and, also, further research to see if the same tendency exists in different settings.

参考文献

Clemet, K., 2003. Mantra or meaning – quality in education and research [online]. Available from http://www.dep.no/
odinarkiv/english/bondevik_II/ufd/045071–090033/dok-bn.html [Accessed 1 March 2007].
Cooper, H., Robinson, J.C. and Patall, E.A., 2006. Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of
research, 1987–2003. Review of Educational Research, 76 (1), 1–62.
El-Khawas, E., 1998. Quality assurance in higher education: recent progress; challenges ahead [online]. In: UNESCO
world conference on higher education, 5–9 October 1998, Paris. Washington, DC: World Bank. Available from:
http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED453720.pdf [Accessed 4 July 2010].
Giertz, B. (2000). The quality concept in higher education. In: C. Baccarani, ed. Conference Proceedings, TQM for
Higher Education Institutions II, 30–31August 1999,Verona.Verona: European Society of Organisational Excellence
(ESOE).
Harvey, L. and Green, D., 1993. Defining quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18 (1), 9–29.
Harvey, L. and Knight, P., 1996. Transforming higher education. Maidenhead: The Society for Research into Higher
Education and Open University Press.
Mazur, E., 1997. Peer instruction: Getting students to think in class. In: E.F. Redish and J.S. Rigden, ed. The Changing
Role of Physics Departments in Modern Universities. Melville, NY: American Institute of Physics.
MCTES 2006. Tertiary education in Portugal. Background report to support the international assessment of the Portuguese
system of tertiary education. Lisbon: MCTES.
Oliveira, P.C., 2009. Ensino da Física num Curso Superior de Engenharia: Na Procura de Estratégias Promotoras de uma
Aprendizagem Activa. Unpublished PhD. Universidade Aveiro.
Oliveira, P.C., et al., 2006. Teaching strategies to promote active learning in higher education. In: A. Méndez-Vilas, A.S.
Martín, J.A.M. González and J.M. González, eds. IV international conference on multimedia and information &
communication technologies in education, vol. 1, Seville. Badajoz: Formatex, 636–640.
Oliveira, P.C., et al., 2007. Curriculum integration in the teaching of physics to first year engineering students
[online]. In: International conference on engineering education (ICEE-2007), Coimbra. Available from: http://www.
ineer.org/Events/ICEE2007/papers/453.pdf [Accessed 12 July 2010].
Oliveira, P.C., et al., 2008. Changing lectures in higher education in physics classes for future civil engineers
[online]. In: G. Várady, ed. International conference on engineering education – ICEE 2008 ‘New Challenges
in Engineering Education’, 2008, Pécs, Budapest. Available from: http://www.iceehungary.net/download/fullp/
full_papers/full_paper78.pdf [Accessed 3 February 2010].
Pile, M., et al., 1997. Quality and development in engineering education at IST. In: Seminário do SEFI ‘A tool to improve
the learning process /evaluation and a quality development in engineering education’, Grimstad, Noruega. Brussels:
SEFI.
Redish, E., 2003. Teaching physics with the physics suite. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Saul, J.M., 1998. Beyond problem solving: Evaluating introductory physics courses through the hidden curriculum.
College Park, MD: Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland.
UNESCO 1998. World declaration on higher education for the twenty-first century: vision and action [online]. World Conference on Higher Education.Available from: http://www.unesco.org/education/educprog/wche/declaration − eng.htm
[Accessed 1 January 2007].
UNESCO 2004. Education for all. The quality imperative. Paris: UNESCO.
Vlãsceanu, L., Grünberg, L. and Pârlea, D., 2004. Quality assurance and accreditation: a glossary of basic terms and
definitions. Papers on Higher Education. Paris: UNESCO.
Vroeijenstijn, A.I., 1995. Quality assurance in medical education. Academic Medicine, 70 (Supplement 7), S59–S67.
Watty, K., 2006. Want to know about quality in higher education? Ask an academic. Quality in Higher Education, 12 (3),
291–301.
Woodhouse, D., 1999. Quality and quality assurance. In: H. de Wit and J. Knight, eds. Quality and internationalization
in higher education. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development, 29–44.
Yang, R., 2004. Toward massification: higher education development in the People’s Republic of China since 1949. In: J.C.
Smart, ed. Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, vol. XIX. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Academic
Publishers, 311–374.

下载
请登录后再下载
相关作者
统计