1. Commission for Academic Accreditation (2011), 2 January 2011, www.caa.ae
2. Hewlett, S.A. and Rashid, R., The battle for female talent in emerging market. Harvard Business Review, 88, 5,
3. United Arab Emirates University, UAEU University Graduates: 29th Cohort (2009), 20 October 2010,
4. Canel, A. and Zachmann, K., Gaining access, crossing bundies: Women in engineering in a comparative
perspective. History and Technol., 14, 1-5 (1997).
5. Berner, B., Explaining exclusion: Women and Swedish engineering education from the 1890s to the 1920s.
History and Technol., 14, 7-29 (1997).
6. Beraud, A., A European research on women and engineering education (2001-2002). European J. of Engng.
Educ., 28, 4, 435-451 (2003).
7. US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Table 275: Bachelor’s, master’s, and
doctor’s degrees conferred by degree-granting institutions, by sex of student and discipline division: 2007-08
(2009), 10 November 2010, nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d09/tables/dt09_275.asp
8. Kvande, E., Factors affecting women’s decision to study at the Technical University of Norway (NTH). European
J. of Engng. Educ., 11, 3, 295-302 (1986).
9. Felder, R.M., Felder, G.N., Mauney, M., Hamrin, Jr. C.E. and Dietz, J.E., A longitudinal study of engineering
student performance and retention. III. Gender differences in student performance and attitudes. J. of Engng.
Educ., 84, 2, 151-163 (1995).
10. Ware, N.C., Steckler, N.A. and Leserman, J., Undergraduate women: who chooses a science major? J. of Higher
Educ., 56, 1, 73-84 (1985).
11. Jagacinski, C.M., Engineering careers: women in a male-dominated field. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11,
12. Smith, A.E. and Dengiz, B., Women in engineering in Turkey – a large scale quantitative and qualitative
examination. European J. of Engng. Educ., 35, 1, 45-57 (2010).
13. Tully, D. and Jacobs, B., Effects of single-gender mathematics classrooms on self-perception of mathematical
ability and post secondary engineering paths: an Australian case study. European J. of Engng. Educ., 35, 4, 455-
14. Hansen, L.S., Walker, J. and Flom, B., Growing Smart: What’s Working for Girls in School. Washington, DC:
The Foundation (1995).
15. Chimpan, S.F. and Wilson, D.M., Understanding Mathematics Course Enrollment and Mathematics Achievement:
A Synthesis of the Research. In: Chipman, S.F., Brush, L.R. and Wilson, D.M. (Eds), Women and Mathematics:
Balancing the Equation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 275-328 (1985).
16. Hartman, K., The advantages of single-sex vs. coeducational environments for high school girls (2010), 10
December 2010, digitalcommons.providence.edu/socialwrk_students/63
17. Watson, C.M., Quatman, T. and Edler, E., Career aspirations of adolescent girls: effects of achievement level,
grade, and single-sex school environment. Sex Roles, 46, 9, 323-335 (2002).
18. Gilbride, K.A., Kennedy, D.C, Waalen, J.K. and Zywno, M., A proactive strategy for attracting women into
engineering. Canadian J. of Counselling and Psychotherapy Revue canadienne de counseling et de
psychothérapie, 33, 1, 55-65 (1999).
19. Gallant, M. and Pounder, J.S., The employment of female nationals in the United Arab Emirates (UAE): An
analysis of opportunities and barriers. Educ., Business and Society: Contemporary Middle East Issues, 1, 1, 26-33
20. Nelson, C., UAE National Women at Work in the Private Sector: Conditions and Constraints (Labour Market
Study No. 20). Dubai: Centre for Labour Marker Research and Information, The National Human Resource
Development and Employment Authority (2004).
21. Adelman, C., Women and Men of the Engineering Path: A Model for Analysis of Undergraduate Careers.
Washington, DC: US Department of Education and The National Institute for Science Education (1998).
22. Houser, B.B. and Garvey, C., Factors that affect nontraditional vocational enrollment among women. Psychology
of Women Quarterly, 9, 1, 105-117 (1985).
23. Graham, L.P., Profiles of Persistence: A Qualitative Study of Undergraduate Women in Engineering. Blacksburg,
VA: Virginia Polytechnique Institute and State University (1997).
24. Ciccocioppo, A.L., Stewin, L.L., Madill, H.M., Montgomerie, T.C., Tovell, D.R., Armour, M.A. and Fitzimmons,
G.W., Transitional patterns of adolescent females in non-traditional career paths. Canadian J. ofCounselling and
Psychotherapy Revue canadienne de counseling et de psychothérapie, 36, 1, 25-37 (2002).
25. Neumark, D. and Gardecki, R., Women helping women? Role model and mentoring effect on female PhD
students in economic. J. of Human Resource, 33, 1, 220-246 (1998).
26. Bettinger, E.P. and Long, B.T., Do faculty serve as role models? The impact of instructor gender on female
students. The American Economic Review, 95, 2, 152-157 (2005).
27. Bitar, Z., Unemployment rate dangerously high (2011), 20 January 2011, www.gulfnews.com/
28. Swan, M., Arab women need help to break into science and engineering (2010), 5 December 2010,
29. Ismail, M., UAE academic calls for more women in workplace (2011), 22 January 2011, www.thenational.ae/
30. Salem, O., Stereotypes are holding women back (2011), 3 February 2011, www.thenational.ae/news/uaenews/stereotypes-are-holding-women-back