Research and Assessment of Learning Environments through Photoelicitation: Graduate Student Perceptions of Electronics Manufacturing in India


This research studies the positive and negative perceptions of graduate students from the United States studying issues of sustainable electronics and electronics manufacturing in India as part of a National Science Foundation Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship (IGERT) curriculum. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the use of an online photoelicitation method, which intends to probe learning experiences from the graduate students’ international experience through the use of participant-generated photographs taken during the trip. This research provides insight on the importance of international learning experiences in graduate-level engineering education and the value of non-traditional formats of graduate student learning. This research exemplifies the use of this novel method in research and educational assessment of non-traditional learning environments, as well as offers interested engineering educators guidelines to implementing this technique in their individual contexts.


1. International Engineering Alliance. “Graduate Attributes and Professional Competencies.” (2013): 1–16.

2. Nerad, Maresi and Blumenfield, Tami. “Investigating the International Experiences in STEM Graduate Education and Beyond : Report from the February 2011 Workshop to Develop a Research Agenda.” (2011): 1–71.

3. The Council of Graduate Schools. “Modeling Effective Research Ethics Education in Graduate International Collaborations: A Learning Outcomes Approach,” Washington D.C., National Science Foundation (2012): 1–23.

4. Cutler, Stephanie and Borrego, Maura. “Developing Global Competence in Graduate Engineering and Science Students through an IGERT International Internship Program.” Paper Presented at the 40th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Arlington, Virginia, October 27–30, 2010.

5. Gamse, Beth C., Espinosa, Lorelle L., and Roy, Radha. “Essential Competencies for Interdisciplinary Graduate Training in IGERT.” Washington D.C., ABT Associates, 2013.

6. Oladiran, M. Tunde, Uziak, Jacek, Eisenberg, Marco, and Scheffer, Cornie. “Global Engineering Teams – A Programme Promoting Teamwork in Engineering Design and Manufacturing.” European Journal of Engineering Education 36.2 (2011): 173–186.

7. Blumenfield, Tami and Nerad, Maresi. “Assessing International (Post) Graduate Education: A Research Agenda.” Australian Universities’ Review 54.1 (2012): 72–82.

8. Downey, Gary L. et al. “The Globally Competent Engineer: Working Effectively with People who Define Problems Differently.”Journal of Engineering Education 95.2 (2006): 107–122.

9. Deardorff, Darla K. “Theory Reflections: Intercultural Competence Framework/Model.” (2006).

10. Lohmann, Jack R., Rollins, Howard A., and Hoey, J. Joseph. “Defining, Developing and Assessing Global Competence in Engineers.” European Journal of Engineering Education 31.1 (2006): 119–131.

11. Rubin, Donald L. and Matthews, Paul H. “Learning Outcomes Assessment: Extrapolating from Study Abroad to International Service-Learning.” Journal of Higher Eduation Outreach and Engagement 17.2 (2013): 67–86.

12. Sadrozinski, Renate. “Evaluative Framework for International Collaboration.” (2008).

13. Forin, Tiago R., Adams, Robin, and Hatten, Kristin. “Crystallized Identity: A Look at Identity Development through Cross-Disciplinary Experiences in Engineering.” Paper presented at the 119th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas, June 11–14, 2012.

14. Hatten, Kristin, Forin, Tiago R., and Adams, Robin. “A Picture Elicits a Thousand Meanings: Photo Elicitation as a Method for Investigating Cross-Disciplinary Identity Development.” Paper presented at the 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia, June 23–26, 2013.

15. Morley, Katherine M., Pawley, Alice L., Jordan, Shawn S., and Adams, Robin. “Gender and Engineering: Photo Elicitation as a Method of Inquiry.” Paper presented at the 118th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC, Canada, June 26–29, 2011.

16. Jordan, Shawn S., Adams, Robin, Pawley, Alice L., and Radcliffe, David. “Work in Progress - The Affordances of Photo Elicitation as a Research and Pedagogical Method.” Paper presented at the 39th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Antonio, Texas, October 18–21, 2009.

17. Tunnell, Kenneth D. “Reflections on Visual Field Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 11.4 (2012): 340–352.

18. Schwartz, Dona. “Visual Ethnography: Using Photography in Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Sociology 12.2 (1989): 119–154.

19. Cappello, Marva. “Photo Interviews: Eliciting Data through Conversations with Children.” Field Methods 17.2 (2005): 170–182.

20. Heisley, Deborah D. and Levy, Sidney J. “Autodriving: A Photoelicitation Technique.” Journal of Consumer Research 18.2 (1991): 257–272.

21. Keats, Patrice A. “The Moment is Frozen in Time: Photojournalists’ Metaphors in Describing Trauma Photography.” Journal of Constructivist Psychology 23.3 (2010): 231–255.

22. Schulze, S. “The Usefulness of Reflexive Photography for Qualitative Research: A Case Study in Higher Education.” South African Journal of Higher Education 21.5 (2007): 536–553.

23. Wright, Newell D. and Larsen, Val. “Every Brick Tells a Story: Study Abroad as an Extraordinary Experience.” Marketing Education Review 22.2 (2012): 121–142.

24. Carlsson, Britta. “Depicting Experiences.” Scandanavian Journal of Educational Research 45.2 (2001): 125–143.

25. Preskill, Hallie. “The Use of Photography in Evaluating School Culture.” International Journal of Qualtiative Studies in Education 8.2 (1995): 183–193.

26. Thomson, Pat and Gunter, Helen. “The Methodology of Students-as-Researchers: Valuing and Using Experience and Expertise to Develop Methods.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 28.3 (2007): 327–342.

27. Clark-Ibanez, Marisol. “Framing the Social World with Photo-Elicitation Interviews.” The American Behavioral Scientist 47.12 (2004): 1507–1527.

28. Harper, Douglas. “Talking about Pictures: A Case for Photo Elicitation.” Visual Studies 17.1 (2002): 13–26.

29. Epstein, Iris, Stevens, Bonnie, and McKeever, Patricia. “Photo Elicitation Interview (PEI): Using Photos to Elicit Children’s Perspectives.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5.3 (2006): 1–11.

30. Harley, Anne. “Picturing Reality: Power, Ethics, and Politics in Using Photovoice.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 11.4 (2012): 320–340.

31. Jenkings, K. Neil, Woodward, Rachel, and Winter, Trish. “The Emergent Production of Analysis in Photo Elicitation: Pictures of Military Identity.” Forum: Qualtitative Social Research 9.3 (2008): 1-30.

32. Pain, Helen. “A Literature Review to Evaluate the Choice and Use of Visual Methods.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 11.4 (2013): 303–320.

33. Guillemin, Marilys and Drew, Sarah.“Questions of Process in Participant-Generated Visual Methodologies.” Visual Studies 25.2 (2010): 175–188.

34. Thupayagale-Tshweneagae, G. and Mokomane, Z. “Needs of South African Adolescents Orphaned by AIDS: Evidence from Photography and Photo-Elicitation.” International Nursing Review 60.1 (2013): 88–95.

35. Van Auken, Paul M., Frisvoll, Svein J., and Stewart, Susan I. “Visualising Community: Using Participant-Driven Photo-Elicitation for Research and Application.” Local Environment 15.4 (2010): 373–388.

36. Slutskaya, Natasha, Simpson, Alexander, and Hughes, Jason. “Lessons from Photoelicitation: Encouraging Working Men to Speak.” Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal 7.1 (2012): 16–33.

37. Westwood, Sheena. “Shopping in Sanitised and Un-sanitised Spaces: Adding Value to Tourist Experiences.” Journal of Retail and Leisure Property 5.4 (2006): 281–291.

38. Matteucci, Xavier. “Photo Elicitation: Exploring Tourist Experiences with Researcher-Found Images.” Tourism Management 35.1 (2013): 190–197.